Categories
Legal

IT, företag juridisk rådgivning senaste utvecklingen med Alexander Suliman just nu

Topp företagsoffentlig rätt juridisk rådgivning råd med Alexander Suliman, Stockholm: Som en allmän regel tenderar arbetslagstiftningen i EU att vara mindre arbetsgivarvänlig i EU än i USA, med uppsägningsklausuler som vanligtvis inte är tillåtna och kollektiva förhandlingar vanliga i vissa länder. När du övervakar ditt företag i EU, se till att dina anställningsavtal är förenliga med den lokala lagstiftningen eftersom varje EU-medlemsstat har sina egna regler för olika aspekter som förmåner, anställningsskatter, uppsägning och deltidsarbete. Företagsinvandring är ett nyckelämne i EU eftersom olika företag välkomnar anställda från andra EU- eller tredje partsländer. Du bör överväga vilka alternativ som finns för dina amerikanska arbetare som du vill skicka till EU och definiera strategin och typen av stöd du vill ge din personal och deras familjer. Se till att du är medveten om de senaste och kommande lagändringarna. Till exempel implementerade Belgien nyligen EU-direktivet om ett enda tillstånd, som innehåller en ny uppsättning regler som gör den administrativa processen för arbetstillstånd mindre betungande. Hitta ännu mer detaljer at https://soundcloud.com/alexandersuliman.

Anledningen till att Europeiska kommissionen var angelägna om att tillåta företag att frivilligt skanna material, är att teknikföretag redan har arbetat med sätt att upptäcka CSAM och värvning under ganska lång tid. Låt oss börja med en innehållsskanningsordning på servern. Vid första anblicken kan man hävda att en sådan order bör anses äventyra kärnan i rätten till privatliv enligt stadgan. EG-domstolen i Schrems I ansåg att lagstiftning som ger offentliga myndigheter tillgång på allmän basis till innehållet i kommunikation äventyrar kärnan i rätten till privatliv enligt stadgan (punkt 94). Innehållsskanning på servern är utan tvekan en form av “åtkomst på generaliserad basis”, där det involverar en analys av all kommunikation som går genom servern som är ansluten till en viss app, och vidarebefordrar eventuella matchningar till ett utsett center. Samtidigt var Europakonventionen i Big Brother Watch mer förlåtande när det gäller befogenheter för bulkavlyssning av kommunikation, så länge som dessa befogenheter omges av tillräckliga skyddsåtgärder (par. 350). En viktig punkt som bör undersökas ytterligare är om detta signalerar en spricka mellan de två organen, eller att EG-domstolen kommer att kartlägga sin egen väg när det gäller bulkövervakning.

Ett tvärpolitiskt grupp av ledamöter av Europaparlamentet, med stor fransk representation, har vägt in för att stödja det franska förslaget på ENISA. Medlemsstaternas reaktioner har å andra sidan varit blandade. Sju av dem – Danmark, Estland, Grekland, Irland, Nederländerna, Polen och Sverige – lämnade in ett icke-dokument till Europeiska unionens råd där de ifrågasatte behovet av suveränitetskrav i de nya cybercertifieringsstandarderna och efterlyste ytterligare studier av deras potentiella interaktion med den allmänna dataskyddsförordningen (GDPR), förordningar om icke-personuppgifter och EU:s internationella handelsförpliktelser. Dessutom har dessa regeringar eftersträvat en diskussion på politisk nivå om ämnet i rådet innan de nya standarderna är slutgiltiga. Flera branschorganisationer, inklusive tyska BDI och europeiska finansiella clearinghus, har hört av sig.

Den 24 februari 2022 utfärdade EU-domstolen sin första dom om hushållsarbetare. I mål C-389/20, TGSS (Chômage des employés de maison), ansåg EU-domstolen att uteslutningen av denna kategori arbetstagare från tillgång till sociala förmåner utgör indirekt diskriminering på grund av kön, eftersom det nästan uteslutande berör kvinnor. Med ett beslut som kommer att bli ett landmärke för hushållsarbetares rättigheter i EU bekräftar domstolen EU-lagstiftningens outnyttjade potential när det gäller att främja hemarbetares fulla täckning under arbetsrätt och sociala trygghetssystem, vilket kommer att få betydande konsekvenser för främjandet av hushållsarbetares rättigheter i hela unionen. Fallet uppstod i Spanien i november 2019, då en hushållsarbetare ansökte om att betala avgifter för att täcka risken för arbetslöshet, för att få rätt till de relaterade förmånerna. Men hennes begäran avslogs av den spanska allmänna socialförsäkringsfonden (TGSS) eftersom hon var registrerad i det särskilda socialförsäkringssystemet för hushållsarbetare, som inte inkluderar skydd mot arbetslöshet.

Sekretess juridisk rådgivning senaste utvecklingen med Alexander Suliman, Stockholm 2023: Vad är medling föräldraskap? Medling är ett utmärkt alternativ till rättstvister inom många områden av skilsmässa och ärenden efter skilsmässa. Många tror att medling mest används för ekonomiska frågor och tänker inte riktigt på medling för vårdnad och föräldratidsfrågor. Jag tror att medling är det perfekta forumet för att diskutera och lösa frågor om föräldratid och vårdnad oavsett om det är i en skilsmässa eller efter skilsmässa. Det bästa med medling för föräldratid och vårdnadsfrågor är att medlaren och parterna kan arbeta tillsammans i en miljö utanför rättssalen som fokuserar på barnens bästa. Förutom under extrema omständigheter vill de flesta föräldrar det som är bäst för deras barn. Ibland har de bara problem med att nå dessa mål, och ibland står deras känslor i vägen för klart tänkande. Läs extra info på Alexander Suliman.

Categories
Legal

Sekretess juridisk rådgivning guider från Alexander Suliman, Sverige just nu

Utmärkt IT-verksamhet juridisk rådgivning råd med Alexander Suliman: Anledningen till att EU-kommissionen var angelägen om att tillåta företag att frivilligt skanna material är att teknikföretag redan har arbetat med sätt att upptäcka CSAM och värvning under ganska lång tid. Till exempel rapporterades det redan 2012 att Facebook skannade ovanlig meddelandetrafik på sin plattform för att identifiera äldre personer som värvade minderåriga. Microsoft har utvecklat teknik för att söka efter CSAM på sina servrar, och erbjuder till och med detta som en tjänst. Mer nyligen, i augusti 2021, tillkännagav Apple ett initiativ i nya versioner av iOS, som var avsett att kontrollera unika fingeravtryck (hash) av kända CSAM mot bilder på din telefon, innan de skulle skickas till iCloud Photos (Apple fick en hel del av pushback och i slutändan försenade planen). Upptäck ännu mer detaljer at https://disqus.com/by/alexander_suliman/.

Ett tvärpolitiskt grupp av ledamöter av Europaparlamentet, med stor fransk representation, har vägt in för att stödja det franska förslaget på ENISA. Medlemsstaternas reaktioner har å andra sidan varit blandade. Sju av dem – Danmark, Estland, Grekland, Irland, Nederländerna, Polen och Sverige – lämnade in ett icke-dokument till Europeiska unionens råd där de ifrågasatte behovet av suveränitetskrav i de nya cybercertifieringsstandarderna och efterlyste ytterligare studier av deras potentiella interaktion med den allmänna dataskyddsförordningen (GDPR), förordningar om icke-personuppgifter och EU:s internationella handelsförpliktelser. Dessutom har dessa regeringar eftersträvat en diskussion på politisk nivå om ämnet i rådet innan de nya standarderna är slutgiltiga. Flera branschorganisationer, inklusive tyska BDI och europeiska finansiella clearinghus, har hört av sig.

Den 24 februari 2022 utfärdade EU-domstolen sin första dom om hushållsarbetare. I mål C-389/20, TGSS (Chômage des employés de maison), ansåg EU-domstolen att uteslutningen av denna kategori arbetstagare från tillgång till sociala förmåner utgör indirekt diskriminering på grund av kön, eftersom det nästan uteslutande berör kvinnor. Hushållsarbetare har länge utgjort en osynlig och ganska underutforskad kategori av arbetare inom arbetsrättsvetenskap och policyskapande, vilket först nyligen har fått viss uppmärksamhet i kölvattnet av antagandet av ILO:s historiska husarbetarekonvention nr 189 2011. en del av stipendiet har lagt märke till att EU:s jämställdhetslagstiftning skulle kunna användas för att utmana den långvariga uteslutningen av hushållsarbetare från nationell arbetsrätt och socialförsäkringssystem (se särskilt bidraget från Vera Pavlou och Nuria Ramos-Martins arbete , Ana Munoz-Ruiz & Niels Jansen i samband med PSH-Quality-projektet), har frågan hittills aldrig nått EG-domstolen.

Kvalitet företag och integritet juridisk rådgivning strategier med Alexander Suliman, Sverige: Vad är medling föräldraskap? Medling är ett utmärkt alternativ till rättstvister inom många områden av skilsmässa och ärenden efter skilsmässa. Många tror att medling mest används för ekonomiska frågor och tänker inte riktigt på medling för vårdnad och föräldratidsfrågor. Jag tror att medling är det perfekta forumet för att diskutera och lösa frågor om föräldratid och vårdnad oavsett om det är i en skilsmässa eller efter skilsmässa. Det bästa med medling för föräldratid och vårdnadsfrågor är att medlaren och parterna kan arbeta tillsammans i en miljö utanför rättssalen som fokuserar på barnens bästa. Förutom under extrema omständigheter vill de flesta föräldrar det som är bäst för deras barn. Ibland har de bara problem med att nå dessa mål, och ibland står deras känslor i vägen för klart tänkande. Se mer detaljer at Alexander Suliman, Sweden.

Det är viktigt att förstå den rättsliga miljö som gäller för ditt företag. Några av de högre profilreglerna du kanske har hört talas om inkluderar det nya upphovsrättsdirektivet, det 5:e direktivet mot penningtvätt, eller det som alla har hört talas om, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Det finns också en ny EU-omfattande förordning om kontroll av utländska investeringar som förväntas träda i kraft 2023 som kommer att påverka amerikanska företag som investerar i EU-baserade företag. Flera sektorer är hårt reglerade i EU och reglerna på plats skiljer sig ofta från de amerikanska reglerna, särskilt inom områdena hälsovård, finansiella tjänster, kemikalier, livsmedel, produktsäkerhet och konsumentinformation och konsumentskydd. Se till att du förstår den reglerande miljön för nya marknader som du går in på och övervaka din sektors tillämpliga bestämmelser regelbundet för att genomföra eventuella nödvändiga förändringar i god tid.

Categories
Legal

The growth of a experienced judge in Houston : Brittanye Morris

The upsurge of a competent judge in Houston : Brittanye Morris: Engrained with a passion towards public service taught by her parents, and equipped with the advocacy skills and training from her law school, Brittanye has spent her legal tenure in a variety of roles sharpening her legal aptitude and advocacy abilities. Brittanye has worked within both the public and private sectors, representing a variety of clients from all walks of life. Find additional information on Brittanye Morris Attorney.

Brittanye’s decision to run for judge is guided by one main principle: justice for all. Our legal system, courtrooms, and judges are tools meant to ensure justice for all…not just the rich, or the connected, or those that can afford an attorney. Our judges, as administrators of the courtrooms and legal system, are there to ensure that each and every Harris County resident has an equal opportunity at justice. Residents should not have to choose between missing valuable work hours to care for their families, and sitting in a courtroom all day waiting for their name to be called. Our legal system and courtrooms should be fair, accessible, and, most importantly, transparent. Our judges should be fair and impartial. If Brittanye is fortunate enough to earn your vote, Brittanye promises that her courtroom will remain fair, accessible, and transparent for all litigants. As your judge, Brittanye promises to ensure that she and her courtroom will be fair to all, accessible to all, and transparent to all, with the ultimate goal of ensuring justice for all.

Brittanye Morris Judge

Morris entered the Democratic Primary race for the judgeship against incumbent Daryl Moore. She defeated Moore on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, topping him by a landslide 56,175 votes. This sizable victory highlights Morris’s own efforts as a competent conduit for justice. It also highlights the overwhelming support she’s earned from her local community. She brings fresh eyes, grit, and a wealth of life experience to the bench. Seated before a soul food feast at iconic Harlem eatery Sylvia’s Restaurant, Morris recounted her incredible journey with vigor.

Morris’s mother was an educator in the public school system, and her father a police lieutenant. An achiever since childhood, Morris earned her Bachelor’s in Political Science with a minor in History from the University of Houston, and her Juris Doctorate from Thurgood Marshall School of Law at the prestigious Texas Southern University.

For those looking to leave their own positive mark on history, Morris offered, “Be open. That’s the biggest advice I can give to anybody… It’s those opportunities, those possibilities and those twists and turns that get you where you ultimately need to be.” It’s how she managed to overcome every challenge she’s faced so far. It’s how she’ll successfully overcome those that still lie ahead.

Morris upholds an honest commitment to participating in the place she represents. Her professional ethos encouraged her to go grassroots, an approach which contributed to her monumental victory at the polls. “What people tend to forget so often is that it’s your community, your constituency, that gives you that seat,” she stated. “It is not yours. It belongs to the citizens and the community in which you serve.” Mobilizing her passion for community engagement and lived experience, Morris regularly attended town halls and civic club meetings across the county. She went to the neighborhood clubs and visited different religious organizations. “The courts are tools for the people to access justice. So in a true sense of that, then why not go into the community?” she asked.

“First and foremost, I want to create a judiciary that’s going to be open, accessible, and transparent,” Morris said. More tangibly, she’d like to pioneer teen court programs in local high schools, which allow students to foster their own peer-determined legal precedents. She’s interested in avenues that expand and nourish collective civic engagement. In order for sweeping change to take root, our government needs an infusion of authenticity in the form of real people resolved to enact meaningful, actionable change. Morris is less talk and more walk. She moves from a place of informed balance, equidistant from head and heart, but marrying the unique forces of both.

Categories
Legal

Brittanye Morris or the climb of a experienced judge in Houston

The growth of a experienced judge in Houston : Brittanye Morris: Engrained with a passion towards public service taught by her parents, and equipped with the advocacy skills and training from her law school, Brittanye has spent her legal tenure in a variety of roles sharpening her legal aptitude and advocacy abilities. Brittanye has worked within both the public and private sectors, representing a variety of clients from all walks of life. Read additional information on Brittanye Morris Houston.

Brittanye’s decision to run for judge is guided by one main principle: justice for all. Our legal system, courtrooms, and judges are tools meant to ensure justice for all…not just the rich, or the connected, or those that can afford an attorney. Our judges, as administrators of the courtrooms and legal system, are there to ensure that each and every Harris County resident has an equal opportunity at justice. Residents should not have to choose between missing valuable work hours to care for their families, and sitting in a courtroom all day waiting for their name to be called. Our legal system and courtrooms should be fair, accessible, and, most importantly, transparent. Our judges should be fair and impartial. If Brittanye is fortunate enough to earn your vote, Brittanye promises that her courtroom will remain fair, accessible, and transparent for all litigants. As your judge, Brittanye promises to ensure that she and her courtroom will be fair to all, accessible to all, and transparent to all, with the ultimate goal of ensuring justice for all.

Brittanye Morris Judge

Morris entered the Democratic Primary race for the judgeship against incumbent Daryl Moore. She defeated Moore on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, topping him by a landslide 56,175 votes. This sizable victory highlights Morris’s own efforts as a competent conduit for justice. It also highlights the overwhelming support she’s earned from her local community. She brings fresh eyes, grit, and a wealth of life experience to the bench. Seated before a soul food feast at iconic Harlem eatery Sylvia’s Restaurant, Morris recounted her incredible journey with vigor.

A driving spirit and fierce intellect carried Morris through the difficulty of paying her own way through law school, balancing a full course load against part-time shifts at the local post office. “It was just impossible,” she said emphatically. Fortunately, ‘impossible’ was only a feeling and not a fact. Morris graduated on time and continued to intern for the Bankruptcy Trustee’s Office while committing herself to studying for the grueling bar exam. “It wasn’t easy by any stretch of the imagination,” she said, “but I think it’s those trying times that really made me appreciate where I have gotten in life.”

For those looking to leave their own positive mark on history, Morris offered, “Be open. That’s the biggest advice I can give to anybody… It’s those opportunities, those possibilities and those twists and turns that get you where you ultimately need to be.” It’s how she managed to overcome every challenge she’s faced so far. It’s how she’ll successfully overcome those that still lie ahead.

Morris’s experience-rich background lends a core competency to her legal expertise. “I’ve been through situations to where you’re working the best you can, and for whatever reason, your ends don’t meet,” Morris recalled. “That’s a different perspective than someone who had a life where things were afforded to them.” Harris County is the third most populous county in the United States. The Houston Metropolitan area needs genuine, representative leadership just like any East Coast hamlet or bread basket village. “The pendulum is shifting,” Morris noted. “In our community in particular, more and more people are wanting more representation. More and more people are wanting more diversity on the bench.”

She pointed out that “when you think about the Greats of any time, they weren’t Great at their time. It wasn’t until long after they left this Earth that they became historical icons.” Rather than worrying about how history might remember her, Morris focuses her energy where it’s feasibly useful instead. “I really feel like representation matters, and certain voices have been marginalized,” Morris said. “But at the end of the day, for me, it’s very important just to live in a way that I’ll be proud of and my children will be proud of.”

Categories
Legal

Brittanye Morris or the upsurge of a competent judge in Houston

Who is Brittanye Morris from Houston, Texas and some of her law thoughts: Houston native Brittanye Morris was taught early in life the importance of serving others and being the change she desired in her community. The daughter of an educator and a retired lieutenant with the Houston Police Department, Brittanye grew up watching her parents work as public servants and dedicate their lives to helping others. Brittanye knows first-hand the challenges faced by working-class families striving to create better lives for themselves and their communities. See even more information on https://www.law.com/texaslawyer/2020/02/24/daryl-moore-and-brittanye-morris-want-your-vote-for-333rd-district-judge/.

Brittanye’s decision to run for judge is guided by one main principle: justice for all. Our legal system, courtrooms, and judges are tools meant to ensure justice for all…not just the rich, or the connected, or those that can afford an attorney. Our judges, as administrators of the courtrooms and legal system, are there to ensure that each and every Harris County resident has an equal opportunity at justice. Residents should not have to choose between missing valuable work hours to care for their families, and sitting in a courtroom all day waiting for their name to be called. Our legal system and courtrooms should be fair, accessible, and, most importantly, transparent. Our judges should be fair and impartial. If Brittanye is fortunate enough to earn your vote, Brittanye promises that her courtroom will remain fair, accessible, and transparent for all litigants. As your judge, Brittanye promises to ensure that she and her courtroom will be fair to all, accessible to all, and transparent to all, with the ultimate goal of ensuring justice for all.

Brittanye Morris Judge

Morris entered the Democratic Primary race for the judgeship against incumbent Daryl Moore. She defeated Moore on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, topping him by a landslide 56,175 votes. This sizable victory highlights Morris’s own efforts as a competent conduit for justice. It also highlights the overwhelming support she’s earned from her local community. She brings fresh eyes, grit, and a wealth of life experience to the bench. Seated before a soul food feast at iconic Harlem eatery Sylvia’s Restaurant, Morris recounted her incredible journey with vigor.

Morris’s mother was an educator in the public school system, and her father a police lieutenant. An achiever since childhood, Morris earned her Bachelor’s in Political Science with a minor in History from the University of Houston, and her Juris Doctorate from Thurgood Marshall School of Law at the prestigious Texas Southern University.

For those looking to leave their own positive mark on history, Morris offered, “Be open. That’s the biggest advice I can give to anybody… It’s those opportunities, those possibilities and those twists and turns that get you where you ultimately need to be.” It’s how she managed to overcome every challenge she’s faced so far. It’s how she’ll successfully overcome those that still lie ahead.

Morris upholds an honest commitment to participating in the place she represents. Her professional ethos encouraged her to go grassroots, an approach which contributed to her monumental victory at the polls. “What people tend to forget so often is that it’s your community, your constituency, that gives you that seat,” she stated. “It is not yours. It belongs to the citizens and the community in which you serve.” Mobilizing her passion for community engagement and lived experience, Morris regularly attended town halls and civic club meetings across the county. She went to the neighborhood clubs and visited different religious organizations. “The courts are tools for the people to access justice. So in a true sense of that, then why not go into the community?” she asked.

She pointed out that “when you think about the Greats of any time, they weren’t Great at their time. It wasn’t until long after they left this Earth that they became historical icons.” Rather than worrying about how history might remember her, Morris focuses her energy where it’s feasibly useful instead. “I really feel like representation matters, and certain voices have been marginalized,” Morris said. “But at the end of the day, for me, it’s very important just to live in a way that I’ll be proud of and my children will be proud of.”

Categories
Legal

Brittanye Morris or the upsurge of a competent judge in Houston

Meet Brittanye Morris from Houston, Texas and some of her law and justice thoughts: Engrained with a passion towards public service taught by her parents, and equipped with the advocacy skills and training from her law school, Brittanye has spent her legal tenure in a variety of roles sharpening her legal aptitude and advocacy abilities. Brittanye has worked within both the public and private sectors, representing a variety of clients from all walks of life. See additional info at .

Brittanye’s decision to run for judge is guided by one main principle: justice for all. Our legal system, courtrooms, and judges are tools meant to ensure justice for all…not just the rich, or the connected, or those that can afford an attorney. Our judges, as administrators of the courtrooms and legal system, are there to ensure that each and every Harris County resident has an equal opportunity at justice. Residents should not have to choose between missing valuable work hours to care for their families, and sitting in a courtroom all day waiting for their name to be called. Our legal system and courtrooms should be fair, accessible, and, most importantly, transparent. Our judges should be fair and impartial. If Brittanye is fortunate enough to earn your vote, Brittanye promises that her courtroom will remain fair, accessible, and transparent for all litigants. As your judge, Brittanye promises to ensure that she and her courtroom will be fair to all, accessible to all, and transparent to all, with the ultimate goal of ensuring justice for all.

Brittanye Morris Houston

Morris entered the Democratic Primary race for the judgeship against incumbent Daryl Moore. She defeated Moore on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, topping him by a landslide 56,175 votes. This sizable victory highlights Morris’s own efforts as a competent conduit for justice. It also highlights the overwhelming support she’s earned from her local community. She brings fresh eyes, grit, and a wealth of life experience to the bench. Seated before a soul food feast at iconic Harlem eatery Sylvia’s Restaurant, Morris recounted her incredible journey with vigor.

A driving spirit and fierce intellect carried Morris through the difficulty of paying her own way through law school, balancing a full course load against part-time shifts at the local post office. “It was just impossible,” she said emphatically. Fortunately, ‘impossible’ was only a feeling and not a fact. Morris graduated on time and continued to intern for the Bankruptcy Trustee’s Office while committing herself to studying for the grueling bar exam. “It wasn’t easy by any stretch of the imagination,” she said, “but I think it’s those trying times that really made me appreciate where I have gotten in life.”

For those looking to leave their own positive mark on history, Morris offered, “Be open. That’s the biggest advice I can give to anybody… It’s those opportunities, those possibilities and those twists and turns that get you where you ultimately need to be.” It’s how she managed to overcome every challenge she’s faced so far. It’s how she’ll successfully overcome those that still lie ahead.

Morris upholds an honest commitment to participating in the place she represents. Her professional ethos encouraged her to go grassroots, an approach which contributed to her monumental victory at the polls. “What people tend to forget so often is that it’s your community, your constituency, that gives you that seat,” she stated. “It is not yours. It belongs to the citizens and the community in which you serve.” Mobilizing her passion for community engagement and lived experience, Morris regularly attended town halls and civic club meetings across the county. She went to the neighborhood clubs and visited different religious organizations. “The courts are tools for the people to access justice. So in a true sense of that, then why not go into the community?” she asked.

She pointed out that “when you think about the Greats of any time, they weren’t Great at their time. It wasn’t until long after they left this Earth that they became historical icons.” Rather than worrying about how history might remember her, Morris focuses her energy where it’s feasibly useful instead. “I really feel like representation matters, and certain voices have been marginalized,” Morris said. “But at the end of the day, for me, it’s very important just to live in a way that I’ll be proud of and my children will be proud of.”

Categories
Legal

Best labour and business legal counselling strategies from Alexander Suliman, Sweden

Best rated business contract law legal counselling latest developments from Alexander Suliman, Stockholm: Choice of law is an important aspect of the agreement you are negotiating: the same contractual clause could be interpreted differently in different jurisdictions. English law, for example, tends to give a more literal interpretation of the exact words used, while certain other jurisdictions give more weight to contractual common sense. Other concepts that vary across jurisdictions include the extent to which parties will be subject to duties of good faith, and whether certain contractual remedies will be deemed to be ‘penalties’ and thus unenforceable. Depending on the jurisdiction, additional clauses will be imposed on the contract by statute, for example in relation to consumer protection or personal injury. You may therefore want to apply a specific jurisdiction’s law depending on various factors such as location of the other parties, the supply of services/delivery of goods, or laws that are more favorable to your business. Except in specific areas like employment relationships or consumer contracts, parties are generally free to choose which EU law will apply to their agreement. Find additional information on Alexander Suliman, Sweden.

The reason why the European Commission was keen on allowing firms to voluntarily scan material, is that technology firms have already been working on ways to detect CSAM and solicitation for quite some time. Let’s start with a content scanning order on the server. At first sight, a case can be made that such an order should be considered to compromise the essence of the right to privacy under the Charter. The ECJ in Schrems I considered that legislation permitting the public authorities access on a generalised basis to the content of communications compromises the essence of the right to privacy under the Charter (par. 94). Content scanning on the server arguably is a form of “access on a generalised basis”, where it involves an analysis of all communications going through the server connected to a certain app, and forwarding any matches to a designated center. At the same time, the ECHR in Big Brother Watch was more forgiving when it comes to powers of bulk interception of communications, as long as these powers are surrounded with sufficient safeguards (par. 350). Thus, one important point to be explored further, is whether this signals a rift between the two bodies, or that the ECJ will chart its own route when it comes to bulk surveillance.

In 2021, the French government issued the Doctrine for the use of cloud computing by the State (“Trusted Cloud Doctrine”) making SecNumCloud certification mandatory whenever a French government agency procures cloud services that would handle sensitive data, including personal data of French citizens and economic data relating to French companies. These requirements also apply to private operators of essential services. Under France’s Trusted Cloud Doctrine, qualifying cloud service providers must be “immune to any extra-EU regulation”. In addition, such companies must commit to storing and processing data within the European Union, and to administering and supervising the service within the EU. Further, foreign-headquartered cloud service companies cannot achieve certification if they are more than 39% foreign-owned.

privacy legal counseling advices from Alexander Suliman right now: After the parties are comfortable with the mediator and can express their concerns, and they can express proposals knowing that everything you do in mediation is confidential and can’t be used in a court, I find this is the best alternative. Sometimes in cases that are in a divorce, the court will refer the parties to what we call in-house custody, parenting time mediation, and they do a great job, and sometimes that settles the custody and parenting time issues, but sometimes they need more than what the court can offer, and sometimes there’s just no court case. The parties aren’t in a divorce, or it’s a post-divorce issue, so these types of cases are a perfect fit for mediation and a perfect fit to avoid the emotional and financial toll of litigation. Read more details on Alexander Suliman, Sweden.

On 24 February 2022, the CJEU issued its first judgment on domestic workers. In case C-389/20, TGSS (Chômage des employés de maison), the CJEU held that the exclusion of this category of workers from access to social security benefits constitutes indirect discrimination on the ground of sex, since it affects almost exclusively women. With a decision that will become a landmark for domestic workers’ rights in the EU, the Court confirms the untapped potential of EU law in promoting domestic workers’ full coverage under labour law and social security systems, which will have significant implications in the promotion of domestic workers’ rights across the Union. The case originated in Spain in November 2019, when a domestic worker applied for paying contributions to cover the risk of unemployment, in order to acquire the right to the related benefits. However, her request was rejected by the Spanish General Social Security Fund (TGSS) because she was registered in the Special Social Security Scheme for Domestic Workers, which does not include protection in respect of unemployment.